![]() ![]() No aggressive CPU usage and both windows and the NAS don't need anything additional installed. It works well and tbh I am not sure why I didn't use it before. This allows a drive to be mapped to an SMB, appearing in windows as a drive, with the added benefit if the SMB is not available, then the files are both still available and folders can be saved to with syncing resuming when the connection is restored. No alert to tell me there was any issue.įollowing this I have resorted to using Windows Sync Centre. ![]() So my local and NAS were totally out of whack. This then put me in a situation where I had no idea which files had been saved / edited and which were not. This appeared to work fine, showing a full resync, however discovered to my dismay that the files were not actually syncing, rather just showing as synced. This seems to be an ongoing issue with drive and one thats not solved with updates.įollowing a format I tried to re sync a folder that was already on my drive. Cloud drives do not need to do this, unless they detect a change. I managed to improved this by disabling advance integrity checks but still far from ideal. This typically takes hours and cannot understand the need for it. This uses CPU and drive access (significant amounts), and generally I have 40,000 files which even if they are only placeholders only need syncing, every boot. There are however some issues:ĭrive takes a long time at boot, and every boot to sync (90% CPU usage) I have lots of files on the NAS I would like to access on an adhoc basis, and being able to do this without accessing the SMB share is a godsend. The ability to be able to sync files to the NAS in a 'Onedrive' like manner, and even with the prospect of on demand access (to save space) is one I relish. It’s free.The principle of synology drive is fantastic. Just head into the Synology DiskStation Manager and go into the Package Center and download HyperBackup. HyperBackup so that the secondary NAS only downloads from the main NAS I tried both methods before settling with method number 2 because the offsite backup NAS is also partly my personal storage device and I don’t want anyone else accessing any part of it.Įither way, let’s quickly run through how to set up the backup methods. Synology Drive ShareSync: Sync between both so you can upload files to either NAS and it’ll be mirrored to the other NAS.The “secondary” unit will only download from the main NAS and never uploads. Hyper Backup: Convert one NAS to become the “main” and the other one as the “secondary” unit.Surprise! Synology actually has two different methods for us to setup an offsite backup. Offsite backup: Synology DiskStation DS920+Ĭhoose what type of offsite backup you want.Office NAS: Synology DiskStation DS420+.In summary, we have two NAS and here’s what we’re going to do: Since these are two Synology NAS running the DiskStation firmware, I want to explore how easy it is to actually set up the NAS as offsite backup. So, when I got my hands on the Synology DiskStation DS920+, I was immediately intrigued by the idea of using it as the offsite backup of our office’s Synology DiskStation DS420+ NAS. But that’s very inefficient as my desktop requires a lot more energy to keep running. I even used my own personal desktop as the offsite backup for the office’s NAS too. There are multiple ways to create an offsite backup. To prevent such a calamity from happening, is to have an offsite backup. But whenever that NAS goes offline – or if it somehow gets damaged – all our data will be lost. Sure, the Synology DiskStation DS920+ comes with 4 bays and we can stripe them to use something like RAID10. However, the biggest problem is that we have to rely on our own when it comes to data backups. The biggest pro is that we can access the files quickly when we are connected to the same local area network (LAN) as that NAS. Having a NAS comes with a few pros and cons for this matter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |